Post by War Office
"NIST's findings do not support the "pancake theory" of collapse"http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
The only people who put forward a pancake theory are conspiracists.
It's like saying that "there's no way a passenger car can go 1,286 MPH,
therefore Princess Diana was assassinated by ISI snipers."
FEMA's pancake collapse theory was the first Official explanation and
widely promoted in 2001 and 2002.
It was thoroughly debunked and discredit by the group of people you
refer to as "conspiracists".
Like I said Vandar. You and your ilk are the greatest criminals of
humanity of our generation. You WILL be hunted down and brought to
Yes Vandar, NIST say that they don't support the pancake collapse
theory of FEMA. However, look at what they write:
"NIST's findings do not support the "pancake theory" of collapse,
which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the
WTC towers (the composite floor system-that connected the core columns
and the perimeter columns-consisted of a grid of steel "trusses"
integrated with a concrete slab; see diagram below). Instead, the NIST
investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly
bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of
this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to
the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not
fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon."
But then further down they write:
[6. How could the WTC towers collapse in only 11 seconds (WTC 1) and 9
seconds (WTC 2)-speeds that approximate that of a ball dropped from
similar height in a vacuum (with no air resistance)?]
"In other words, the momentum (which equals mass times velocity) of
the 12 to 28 stories (WTC 1 and WTC 2, respectively) falling on the
supporting structure below (which was designed to support only the
static weight of the floors above and not any dynamic effects due to
the downward momentum) so greatly exceeded the strength capacity of
the structure below that it (the structure below) was unable to stop
or even to slow the falling mass. The downward momentum felt by each
successive lower floor was even larger due to the increasing mass."
Sounds like a pancake collapse theory to me, "which is premised on a
progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers"
Enough of the double speak Vandar. Time to fortify those walls in
Israel. The whole world is going to drag you out to face the courts
for deliberately conspiring to misinform and obstruct the efforts of
the 9/11 Truth Movement.